<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/abc" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weaning Off The Pasture Crack</title>
	<link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org.nz/climate-change/weaning-off-the-pasture-crack/</link>
	<description>The Greenpeace NZ blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Head</title>
		<link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org.nz/climate-change/weaning-off-the-pasture-crack/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.greenpeace.org.nz/climate-change/weaning-off-the-pasture-crack/#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Dairy farms are killing our rivers.  Drink soya milk. A recent 'record' E.C. fine imposed on a Hawkes Bay dairy farm [owned by a large corporate dairy farm company] of $37,000 was just 0.78% of their annual income. The fine should have been the income off the 1500 cows over their resource consent limit= $1.6 million. -crime does not pay -yeah right. . This farm has polluted the [once] pristine Mohaka river.  AND fonterra did not refuse to take milk even though it broke their accord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dairy farms are killing our rivers.  Drink soya milk. A recent &#8216;record&#8217; E.C. fine imposed on a Hawkes Bay dairy farm [owned by a large corporate dairy farm company] of $37,000 was just 0.78% of their annual income. The fine should have been the income off the 1500 cows over their resource consent limit= $1.6 million. -crime does not pay -yeah right. . This farm has polluted the [once] pristine Mohaka river.  AND fonterra did not refuse to take milk even though it broke their accord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org.nz/climate-change/weaning-off-the-pasture-crack/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.greenpeace.org.nz/climate-change/weaning-off-the-pasture-crack/#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Not quite so simple - the wood supplied by the 1.8 million hectares of plantation forestry in NZ (established main on eroded pasture and grazing land) has been one of the main reasons for why native forests in NZ today are not experiencing full scale logging for wood supply.

Many of these forests were planted for soil and water conservation reasons on erosion-prone hill country which was formerly in sheep and cattle pasture.

Half of the country's plantations and one-third of the annual harvest are already third party certified, with the most popular being the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) system. As the deforestation occurring in Central North Island for dairy expansion is showing, there was a surprising amount of native bio-diversity relying on the plantations - locals in CNI near the conversions are noticing a big increase in the numbers of native birds trying to establish themselves on lifestyle blocks in the area now that the plantations are disappearing.

But the main problem arising from turning plantation forest land into dairy land is the massive impact on the climate - NZ's plantation forests are estimated to sequester (absorb) 25 million tonnes of CO 2 from the atmosphere each year, they have an important role to play in the country meeting its Kyoto commitments. Intensive dairy farming is one of the most greenhouse gas producing forms of land use - agriculture accounts for 49% of NZ's greenhouse gas emissions and is one of the fastest growing sources. Deforesting for dairy expansion is a total double whammy for the climate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite so simple - the wood supplied by the 1.8 million hectares of plantation forestry in NZ (established main on eroded pasture and grazing land) has been one of the main reasons for why native forests in NZ today are not experiencing full scale logging for wood supply.</p>
<p>Many of these forests were planted for soil and water conservation reasons on erosion-prone hill country which was formerly in sheep and cattle pasture.</p>
<p>Half of the country&#8217;s plantations and one-third of the annual harvest are already third party certified, with the most popular being the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) system. As the deforestation occurring in Central North Island for dairy expansion is showing, there was a surprising amount of native bio-diversity relying on the plantations - locals in CNI near the conversions are noticing a big increase in the numbers of native birds trying to establish themselves on lifestyle blocks in the area now that the plantations are disappearing.</p>
<p>But the main problem arising from turning plantation forest land into dairy land is the massive impact on the climate - NZ&#8217;s plantation forests are estimated to sequester (absorb) 25 million tonnes of CO 2 from the atmosphere each year, they have an important role to play in the country meeting its Kyoto commitments. Intensive dairy farming is one of the most greenhouse gas producing forms of land use - agriculture accounts for 49% of NZ&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions and is one of the fastest growing sources. Deforesting for dairy expansion is a total double whammy for the climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org.nz/climate-change/weaning-off-the-pasture-crack/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.greenpeace.org.nz/climate-change/weaning-off-the-pasture-crack/#comment-859</guid>
		<description>Are they logging native forests??  Surely not - it must be pine forests. I'd say we're better off without pine forests, they poison the soil, cause erosion, don't provide habitat for much except pests and look hideous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they logging native forests??  Surely not - it must be pine forests. I&#8217;d say we&#8217;re better off without pine forests, they poison the soil, cause erosion, don&#8217;t provide habitat for much except pests and look hideous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
